In the fine poker novel “Shut Up and Deal,” author Jesse May describes a fictional writer of instructional books named Larry Sandtrap, who appears as a disembodied voice in the mind of the main character, Mickey.
When Mickey was in a poker game, he would often hear Sandtrap intoning facts and figures about probabilities and statistics related to the hand in question. Sandtrap might praise a savvy move grounded in the math of the game but scold Mickey for a miscue such as abandoning sound poker strategy in favor of degenerate-style gambling at the table.
I’ve long considered Bob Dancer, the Las Vegas author and high-stakes professional gambler, a sort of Larry Sandtrap of the video poker world.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Super Bowl prop payoff is in the details
When the Arizona Cardinals scored two points on a safety in the Super Bowl, the play figured to resonate with gamblers, especially bettors who focus on propositions, or “props” — the sometimes offbeat wagers on various facets of the game.
After all, betting for or against a Super Bowl safety is a perennial favorite of prop players.
Gamblers betting that a safety will occur are enticed by the “juicy” payoff, often in the range of 8-1 or so.
On the other side, some self-styled wise guys preach that if any value exists in the prop, it’s on the other side. Statistics indicate you’re better off taking the “bridge jumper” route and laying 10-1 that no safety will occur.
After all, betting for or against a Super Bowl safety is a perennial favorite of prop players.
Gamblers betting that a safety will occur are enticed by the “juicy” payoff, often in the range of 8-1 or so.
On the other side, some self-styled wise guys preach that if any value exists in the prop, it’s on the other side. Statistics indicate you’re better off taking the “bridge jumper” route and laying 10-1 that no safety will occur.
Labels:
More Betting,
NFL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
